N617MW

This entry covers the specific airframe bearing U.S. registration N617MW, a 2003-built example of the Cessna 560XL Citation XLS with serial number 560-5318. The airframe is owned by CHOE AVIATION HOLDINGS LLC, a corporation based in Boston, Massachusetts, and is recorded on the U.S. civil registry. The installation and equipment reflect the XLS-class configuration typical of late-model Citation XL-series aircraft, and the airframe is valued at approximately $2,500,000 in current market assessments. No public record of multiple prior operators is provided; the listed owner is a corporate entity domiciled in Boston, MA.

The airframe is certified for 13 seats; the specific executive interior layout for this serial is not published, so the installed cabin configuration is described only as a 13‑seat certified arrangement. Avionics aboard examples in this family are commonly fitted with Honeywell glass‑cockpit suites in the XLS configuration and this airframe is reported with Honeywell avionics consistent with XLS variants. Operationally, aircraft of this capability profile typically undertake medium‑range business missions up to 2,100 nm and high‑speed regional hops at cruise speeds near 422 kts, operating from the owner’s home base in the U.S. Maintenance considerations follow standard Textron Aviation support practices for the 560XL subseries and the PW545A engine type; no special maintenance anomalies for this airframe are reported in the supplied data.

The Cessna 560XL Citation XLS occupies the light-medium business-jet niche, offering transcontinental flexibility with a high cruise speed and a service ceiling of 45,000 ft. Its twin Pratt & Whitney Canada PW545A engines provide commonality advantages versus some competitors, while resale and charter demand for XLS-class airframes is shaped by interior condition, avionics fit (here Honeywell glass), and operator maintenance history. At an estimated value of $2,500,000, this 2003 serial sits in a market where buyers weigh operating economy and cabin capacity against acquisition cost and lifecycle maintenance expectations.